?
Simple justification given by atheists for the belief they hold, is that the presence is not yet convincing. Proof, or the lack of it, doesnt convince ppl to change the steadfast believes they have held so altogether. Telescope was seen to be the devils eye to lead man to ignorance, nd now huger nd powerful eyes of the devil are being made, used nd even sent to other planets to spread evil. This post is not about telescopes or science. This is just what i think of religion.
It wud be clear, on careful observation that each religion is different from the other only on the way they deduce the vision of death nd that which follows. Hindus treat birth nd death as a cycle, going on for lives, in which the price of a deed or “karma” is paid, in this, or either the next birth, and until it is done, the cycle goes on. The christians find the meaning of death in Judgement day, where the verdict is either heaven or hell. Islam is sumwhat similar, “The last hour”, the equivalent of judgement day, is followed by resurrection. But all religions emphasize on the Good nd bad nd the consequences that follow.
Most religions have teachings which are definitely concoctions of divine enlightenment. The ways they are interpreted made them, in the long run, what they are today. Budhism cud be termed modern in this sphere, as Buddha never Stressed on imbibing his teachings blindly. To him, one is a judge of oneself, principles are doctrines of life, nd to choose the principle is the man’s own discretion. A man is free to choose what he believes in, but he just has to remember the aftermath does follow.
Nd buddhism takes it a step further in succession of The Lama. Unlike most other religions or culture, the successor is never the son or the close associate of the ex-preeminent. The next lama is chosen, way before, by prophecies. But this, is actually simply the way to make sure that the power doesnt go into the hands of the ignorant nd the spurious. The successor, by the time he has to mount the acme, is well aware nd known of the power he has in hand, how he has to put it in use, nd how he has to ground himself.
And about the existence of the almighty, or the non-existence of the same, nothing came up without an initiation. There was a source, nd there still is sumthing that drives the clock in rounds. There is a time before time, nd theres no concept of “the beginning of time”. All this, was started off, by sumthing, an energy, that still keeps things going. Birth, death, growth, decay are all driven nd not spontaneous. The existence of “this”, the energy or god or power or whatever u define it as, is not to be shadowed in doubt. It is der. whatever it is.
But, the god cudve been much better than this. He made it, he cud have done it better. The grief nd sorrow, sadism, money, provocation, hunger all cud’ve been not so omnipresent. But, things shudnt be too easy, shud they? If life has been not so “realistic”, this blog wud never be there, neither the computer, nor the clothes u r wearing now. It wud just have been birth, growth, sex, procreation, death. How interesting is that…I know what u are thinking now. 
he he..lol.it was a nice post.a relevant one which puts youth into agnosticism.i’m also in the same plight.should i believe it or not? but the thing is..beyond the science,there exists some power,which u can call it by any name u wish.but there exists.thats it!:)